Web Statistics DoD to cut contractor workforce - OhMyGov News

Follow OhMyGov! on  OhMyGov on Facebook      

  LOGIN  

DoD to cut contractor workforce

By OhMyGov Apr 07 2009, 11:15 AM

The Washington Post reported today that the Pentagon is looking to slash its huge contracting workforce by as much as 13 percent.

At present, DoD's contractors comprise 39 percent of its workforce. Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates's latest budget proposal moves to replace many of those contractors with up to 39,000 additional federal employees over the next five years, and 13,000 of them immediately. The move would bring the level of DoD contractors down to 26 percent of the Pentagon's personnel. 

Contractors are typically engaged when work assignments are short in duration and have a definitive end to the work (though some would argue otherwise), or when specialists are needed for specific projects and the government does not have the institutional capacity to address these needs. But over the years, contractors have begun to substitute for federal employees altogether, often staying in positions for years as entrenched, on-site contractors. (Present company included.) Managers in government, particularly at DoD where the culture is more inviting to contractors -- some feds treat contractors like unwanted stepchildren -- often find it easier and faster to contract employees than to hire federal workers.

Anyone who has ever applied to a federal job understands the federal employee hiring process, given all the red tape, may take up to nine months from time the initial paperwork is filed to post the job to the time someone is hired. The process deters many top tier would-be feds who take other jobs offered to them well before any federal hiring manager even alerts them they are viable candidates.

In start contrast, contractors may be brought on in a matter of weeks, depending on whether an existing contract vessel is already in place or not. For busy managers needing help quickly, contractors can be a real lifeline, even if costs run slightly higher than federal employees (when benefits are factored in). What's more, contractors are much easier to fire than their federal counterparts.

On the flip side, contractors are often charged with being more patriotic to their wallets than their country. And while it may be true that capitalism drives them to be entrepreneurial, there is little reason to believe, especially given the amount of scandals and blunders involving federal employees and politicians, that contractors are any more or less concerned with the well-being of their country than federal employees. 

So while the move to cut contractors from the DoD workforce may drive costs down in the short term and aid in eliminating the perception that contractors are running federal acquisitions at DoD leading to cost overruns, the reality is they are a vital part of the federal workforce that offers an escape route from bureaucratic pitfalls and expensive pension plans. And if the workforce is replaced by federal employees, unlike the contractor community, given union representation and political considerations, an increased DoD federal workforce will be difficult, if not impossible, to reduce in size indefinitely.

BY Andrew B. Einhorn



Most Read


Get our Newsletter!
Click here to sign up and stay informed   

 



Read More: Defense (DoD), Contracting, Pay And Benefits, Business And Economy

 
 
 
Submit
COMMENT

Karol Taylor
April 13, 2009 4:43 PM

It's all in the spin, isn't it? The same information on DoD contractors shared in GovernmentExecutive.com gave this information a much more positive slant. As my friend, a sub sub contractor says, the first contractor gets their cut, then the second contractor gets their cut, then he gets paid a six figure salary with great benefits. Hmmm, who wins in this instance? Certainly not the taxpayers.

janetlynn039
August 14, 2010 8:47 AM

Who are you kidding!!  Most of us know that in order to run a war you need contractors to do the dirty work.  They assume all the liability to personal physical and mental health.  Good luck getting any help if you're hurt while being a civilian contractor on the job.  Also, some of these guys are treated very poorly on the job.  The stress level is off the charts!  Try being a contractor's wife!  No, I didn't think so!

Mark The Economist
May 6, 2011 8:11 AM

Ha Ha Ha!!!!   DoD fell asleep when they discussed root cause analysis being necessary before implementing solutions.  You got to love how they would rather find a work around to the federal hiring system by hiring contractors that are more expensive than fixing the glaring problem:  The federal hiring system!  You establish more loyalty with a federal employee, in my opinion because they become more like family (blood related type).  Sorry contractors, I know your people, but can cost some serious dollars that are ending up being for longer periods of time that originally planned.

Terry Webster
December 17, 2011 3:17 PM

Many of the contractors are former military personnel with years of experience, while the majority of federal employees are recent college graduates with little or no experience. In the case of loyalties you have the ones who have proven it and the ones who have yet to prove their patriotism. Who do you want at the helm?

 

          


 

 
 
 


 

 

 

 


 



  






 

About OhMyGov!

A leader in social media analysis for politics & government

Read More
Press Coverage

Friends

Follow OhMyGov on Twitter and Facebook

See Our Partners


OhMyGov! Feeds