Web Statistics Recovery.gov revamped with an unexpected helper: SharePoint - OhMyGov News

Follow OhMyGov! on  OhMyGov on Facebook      

  LOGIN  

Recovery.gov revamped with an unexpected helper: SharePoint

A Microsoft product to the rescue?

By Richard Hartman Oct 23 2009, 08:44 AM

Cleaner and meaner

Cleaner and meaner

"And we expect you, the American people, to hold us accountable for the results. That is why we have created Recovery.gov, so every American can go online and see how their money is being spent." — President Obama, Feb. 17, 2009

By now almost everyone is aware of the "Obama Stimulus Plan," more formally known as the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009. But not everyone is aware of Recovery.gov, the website that is being used to track the federal government's massive spending bill, the makers of the site, or that the entire thing was built on Microsoft SharePoint — a platform almost every government office already has.

Originally, Recovery.gov version 1.0 (shown below) was powered by Drupal, an open source content management platform offering blogs, forums, newsletters and podcasting among its features. But users were not able to follow the recovery funds from beginning to end as the Obama administration had envisioned — and promised. Nor could site administrators use the site to handle the approval process needed to collect, sort and display spending data being collected from recipients of the funds. As a result, the site became a target and verbal punching bag for watchdogs, open government advocates and lawmakers who were underwhelmed with the content and capability of Recovery.gov.

The original Recovery.gov

 

In response, the Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board charged with tracking stimulus funds made the decision to change not only the site's look but also its core focus and through the Government Services Administration (GSA) they solicited a contract to redesign the site. That $18 million contract was awarded to Maryland-based Smartronix Inc., along with Synteractive, TMP Government, and KPMG.

 The "new and improved" site

 

While the new site (shown above), which launched with data last week, has received a lot of good press, the big untold story is the platform and the possible future of the site.

OhMyGov! sat down with two of the people behind the site's construction, Synteractive's Jame Hirmas, Public Sector Director, and Jason Turim, Business Solution Architect, to dig a little deeper into the blueprints for the new Recovery.gov 2.0 site.

Although programmers will normally tell you they'd rather build a custom solution than use an off the shelf product, with only 11 weeks to develop Recovery.gov, the engineers needed a robust solution that could meet all of the government's security and governance requirements and still be flexible and scalable enough to meet the needs of an entire U.S. population. 

"It made sense to use an out of the box product," Turim said, and SharePoint is "one of the most flexible platforms out there and the government already pays for it."

Development time that would have otherwise been spent building a custom 60% solution was freed up by the decision to use SharePoint, and that allowed the team to address other key business problems, such as how to get data from hundreds of disparate sources. And while Microsoft has long been viewed with disdain for their near monopoly on corporate business platforms, this time, it saved taxpayers a good sum of money.  

Not well known outside the enterprise market, SharePoint is a collection of products and software elements that can be used to host web sites that access shared workspaces, information stores and documents, as well as host defined applications such as wikis, podcasts, blogs, widgets, gadgets, pipes and microblogs. At its core, SharePoint has built-in integration for reporting, collaboration, social networking, and other capabilities that can greatly improve how the public interacts with the government and how government interacts with itself.

"SharePoint provides a lot of capabilities for those within government with a product they already own which has gone through the lengthy (up to 2 years) federal agency certification and accreditation (C&A) process that is not intrusive with their current architecture," said Synteractive's Hirmas. "We really pride ourselves in ‘best of breed' in technology, and while we are not a Microsoft shop, we use Microsoft products, as they are so ingrained in the federal sector."

Another advantage the platform offered is tied to the overarching vision of the site. With SharePoint, users can create individual, separately branded sites off of the main dataset very easily. This will allow for the creation of 50 state Recovery.gov sites.

"The change from a traditional website to a SharePoint platform has not only allowed new Recovery.gov site to be rapidly created and deployed, but has set the stage for greater improvements for the overall site in the near future," added Turim.

By "improvements" Turim means social networking capabilities, which he says are an inevitable and desirable next step. What might this look like? At a basic level, data from Recovery.gov could be made readily available through platforms like Facebook and MySpace. More advanced features could allow users to note errors in the data, interact with the data to construct new data sets and mashups, upload videos using the data to the site, and integrate various localized feeds from Twitter about data using static IP tracking. That way, a user in New York looking up information about her state would be able to see tweets from other New Yorkers talking about the state's funding. Of course, these are ideas the design team has that the government hasn't quite signed off on.

"The government wants to go into the social networking world, but they don't necessarily know what that means," said Hirmas.

Apparently, the Recovery Board members are fearful that allowing any integration with social media might allow inappropriate content on the site or break the site's apolitical bent, which the Board has tried hard to maintain.

Regardless, the new Recovery.gov site stands worlds above the previous version built. A full review of the site will be available shortly. Stay tuned!

 

Related Stories:

[+] Recovery.gov: Debunking Rumors

[+] Ways To Make Government Data Sing

[+] Jive Software: The next leader in the Gov 2.0 market?

 

Read More: Executive Office Of The President (EOP), Office Of Management And Budget (OMB), Leveraging Resources, Innovations, Gov 2.0, Transparency, Good Gov

 
 
 
Submit
COMMENT

Ian Morrish
October 23, 2009 8:39 PM

Other sites hosted on SharePoint

www.wssdemo.com/.../websites.aspx

charles
October 28, 2009 4:12 AM

wow - free ads for microsoft and your site runs on microsoft too. how much are they paying you to sell out freedom for the future americans?

Andrew B. Einhorn
October 28, 2009 8:36 AM

Hi Charles - unfortunately for us we don't get paid by Microsoft. We simply report the facts, which in this case are that recovery.gov was built quickly via a MSFT platform the government had already purchased that the programmers chose to use. No lobbying here. It was just the smart choice at the time. There is a reason the company has done well, and it is not all marketing. Damn, wish I wrote this in Word so I could do a spell check...

spaceghost
October 28, 2009 12:14 PM

Which begs the question, why did the government already have such a large Sharepoint footprint -- buying software they do not need/know what it does, ask questions later? Microsoft executed well with MOSS, but the government is already behind the curve in selecting this tool. Open source alternatives from companies like Sheetster+ Alfresco provide the same benefits as Sharepoint, but without the incontrovertible vendor lockin that the government will now enjoy at the hands of MS. For an informed look at the alternatives that are out there, check out alfresco.com, sheetster.com, mindtouch.com, etc.

Andrew B. Einhorn
October 28, 2009 4:02 PM

Good point spaceghost. MSFT certainly had the muscle to get in the door unlike many other platform providers. Given the difficulty in dealing with the government, the fact of the matter is most companies simply don't know how to jump through all the hoops.

John
October 29, 2009 7:53 AM

So M$ is just great, and that no product that has achieved the marketing muscle to enter the government world should be used by the government? And a big, fat, organization with leagues of sales, marketing and lawyers, who has hardly invented anything original (I actually draw a blank here but don't want to overshoot), is best suited for the government. Hence, let's eliminate any innovation. Well, at least the two sound like a match for heaven! Why do I have the urge to watch Apple 1984's superbowl commercial?

Jerry Wilson
November 4, 2009 7:33 PM

You left out that while sharepoint makes it easy to display data (admittedly a huge plus), you need an army to maintain it. Just sayin'.

Kanwal Khipple
November 5, 2009 4:18 PM

They have done a great job not only on the architecture of the site but as well as the design. Kudos to the architect(s), developers and designers!

Nicholas Holland
November 6, 2009 8:39 AM

As the owner of an agency, www.centresource.com, we are constantly evaluating different platforms.  Since we have experience with both Drupal and Sharepoint, I was excited to see your article.

However, I became less excited when I loaded the Recovery site in Firefox 3.5.5 and saw that the navigation layout was broken.

The irony is that Sharepoint sites, in our experience, don't always play nice with any other browser than IE and it looks like its true again.

When 20%+ of the US is using something other than IE, I'd rather use solutions that don't cause problems for 1 out of 5 users (even higher if you evaluate 'power users').

Regardless, the point of the story is that Drupal couldn't get it done either - thus everything is a trade off :)

One curious question: $18MM contract and it was completed in 11 weeks!  Holy hell, that's an amazing rake for such a short period of time.  Sure/sure, I know their is maintenance - but wow!

YeahRight
November 8, 2009 8:53 AM

The comment "SharePoint provides a lot of capabilities for those within government with a product they already own which has gone through the lengthy (up to 2 years) federal agency certification and accreditation (C&A) process that is not intrusive with their current architecture," Is a bunch of crap. I would like to see Synteractive's Hirmas produce a single accreditation letter for Sharepoint showing that has been through a certification and accrediation review.

data recovery
February 12, 2010 6:07 AM

I can't believe the streak is over; you referenced Data Domain!! As great as Avamar is (I'm a fan) backup remains THE hardest thing to unglue from an environment (retention scheme expiration, etc). The fact is a vast volume of shops are looking for the "make backup better" thing. Crazy but that's where DD is ruling, and ruling in volume. Nice benefit is you can hit it with SQL dumps, Oracle RMAN, any of the VMware backup native schemes, or commonly used point products like Veeam.

The unfortunate truth is IT doesn't think or act strategic. That's my theory on why VCE might fail. They act in budget cycles and manage project portfolios. Strategically insignificant (simple) products like a little old dedupe NAS becomes a GREAT combo for backup, archiving, and DR. They "out NetApp'ed" NetApp.

Absolutely love the deep bomb (Vikings reference) on Avamar and VM backup but I always love how DD get's overlooked. Simplicity

$18 million vs. ?$ (million?)
February 22, 2010 6:10 AM

I've just briefly scanned the above article -- which seems to lack one absolutely essential number/fact: $18 million (SharePoint) vs. ?$ million (Drupal)!

By the way, $18 million for a website ...? Even if on the site there might be a lot of background work going on, but, briefly judging, this seems to be a lot if not too much [to me]. I would really like to know the initial quote/invoice for the [first] Drupal project.

How could one judge about this case if this essential NUMBER is missing? HOW?

Muscle Building Guide Guy
February 22, 2010 5:31 PM

Great post, thanks. Good info like this is hard to come by, I've been looking, and you summed it up perfectly.

CW
February 28, 2010 1:24 PM

Yup. Your MS-powered site is so good that I can't reach the first "related article" as the index is off by one; points to the second "related article". And since you're using some sort of asp-powered incomprehensible numbered node syntax, I wonder if I'll ever be able to read your article. Gee, if you were using Drupal with its descriptive URLs I would just fix the error in the address bar. Too bad you're not using Drupal. Now I'll have to go read the opinions of others.

Andrew B. Einhorn
February 28, 2010 1:29 PM

Thanks for noting the error. It has been fixed.

info@barriergeocon.com
April 26, 2010 7:48 AM

I didn't realize Shairpoint was so flexible with respect to compiling dispirate sources of data.

data recovery
April 28, 2010 1:53 PM

The information you provide is quiet helpful, why I was not able to find it earlier. Anyways I’ve subscribed to your feeds, keep the good work up.

wow guide
May 11, 2010 12:02 AM

This is interesting topic and give many good post. It is very useful and informative.

Dane Fletcher
June 23, 2010 3:12 PM

Interesting points.  I will be sure to add this page to my favorites.

- Dane

FID
January 2, 2011 8:15 AM

Your MS-powered site is so good that I can't reach the first "related article" as the index is off by one; points to the second "related article". And since you're using some sort of asp-powered incomprehensible numbered node syntax, I wonder if I'll ever be able to read your article. Gee, if you were using Drupal with its descriptive URLs I would just fix the error in the address bar

Keylogger
February 21, 2011 12:12 AM

This is a great information........

Traffic Store
March 14, 2011 12:30 AM

I see some other commentators giving you crap for your writing style. I think it’s bold and on the psychological level it’s a title that calls attention to it. Usually I don’t read many blogs but this one caught my eye just by the title. That’s a good example of writing at it’s best. Some people say the vulgarity is unnecessary but it’s probably the reason they read this post as well, so mission accomplished

Mensajes movistar
April 3, 2011 11:04 PM

You left out that while sharepoint makes it easy to display data (admittedly a huge plus), you need an army to maintain it. Just sayin'.

Lancaster Thom
September 8, 2011 10:18 PM

Great, so the government used a tool it shouldn't have paid for in the first place.

 

          


 

 
 
 


 

 

 

 


 



  






 

About OhMyGov!

A leader in social media analysis for politics & government

Read More
Press Coverage

Friends

Follow OhMyGov on Twitter and Facebook

See Our Partners


OhMyGov! Feeds